🔗 Share this article

While the struggling Conservative party convenes in its conference city for its yearly gathering, it has plenty to consider regarding its future direction. Doubt remains if a viable path remains open. We are in challenging circumstances for a governing group that now has almost nothing, if anything, new or unique to say to the public.

An Alternate Reality

The situation might have been so different if concrete steps had been made on an priority that matters to people throughout the UK: Social mobility. But the former leadership hadn’t got the slightest idea on how to turn the trendy talk on levelling up into actual implementation. During the initial period after the general election, it debated what the term truly represented.

I was perplexed, because I had previously explained to Johnson what social mobility entailed when we initially discussed about it during the contest for party leader. The phrase was language I created and used at the Department for Education to talk about equal opportunity. It served as our guiding principle, and its definition is clear: social mobility is the method by which we achieve equality of opportunity – not by taking chances away from those who are already advantaged, but rather by providing opportunities to those that don’t.

Essential Principle

The other key ministry expression we used, “ability is distributed uniformly throughout the nation, but opportunity is not”, served as a intentional wording, representing the two parts of a fairness agenda. To begin with, talent spread evenly but not developed consistently through our education system. Furthermore, opportunities not spread evenly by the private sector or our economic system. Therefore, schools and companies were crucial to achieving improved equality of opportunity. This constituted an agenda about the community framework of our country – fostering individual capabilities and linking them with chances.

The Reality of Implementation

How did levelling up evolve into under the previous government? A towns fund managed by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. Street beautification and rearranged intersections. An official policy document was published nearly three years after Johnson became leader, which saw existing policy approaches repackaged under the fresh social mobility slogan.

Consequently, a wider fairness strategy went undeveloped, as well as all the reform that it may have generated – in funding, enterprise, fiscal strategy, revenue and in community development. Moreover, in education, including a university system that has become a target for politicians of all stripes – despite the fact that it remains the primary vehicle of social mobility for individuals from less privileged homes, including myself, this country has had over the past 30 years. Possibly the sole mechanism of social mobility, functioning widely.

The Importance of Aspiration

Hope is vital for our country to prosper. To foster ambition, there needs to be a believable feeling that effort and reward are linked; that if people aspire, they can achieve. For any government, being able to foster a sense of optimism about the tomorrow is important. Studies by the Institute for Policy Research at the academic establishment and others, recently released, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I established during my tenure – locally targeted strategies to enhancing learning results – led to students in those areas being up to 18 percentage points more hopeful about their future than those in similar areas without these schemes in place. The data shows: just making an sincere effort on pro-social mobility policy can swiftly and beneficially change how people perceive their prospects.

Squandered Chances

Ignoring this evidence, and in the midst of its post-Johnson leadership contest, in autumn 2022, the ruling party ended the initiatives. Why would anyone in those areas vote for a organization that did that? The opportunity areas policy is one example of what might have become a transformative Conservative government agenda on levelling up, but that possibility was totally misused. Strategies such as this can generate optimism and ambition. In contrast, as the ruling party discovered, failing to deliver of fair chances is the biggest blunder any leadership can make. The public held accountable the leadership for its ineffectiveness but, above all, for its broken promises on equal opportunity.

The Current Landscape

Currently the baton on equal opportunity and fair access has been transferred to a new administration. The old slogan has been cast off. The current administration has its own political rhetoric of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The organization that is gradually replacing the hapless incumbents, Reform UK, also has its own terminology – “industrial revival”. It’s a phrase to talk about new opportunities in regions like the one I was raised in, in South Yorkshire. It claims that an historical manufacturing base can be reborn into an modern manufacturing sector.

To the electorate, it must feel like a repetitive cycle. Identical problem, new terminology. Yet, currently, little improvement.

Lessons for the Future

If Labour and Reform UK want to prevent the similar destiny, both these parties should understand the Tories’ mistakes on social mobility; that social mobility rhetoric is easy to say, but effective implementation of fairer outcomes is much harder. Our nation’s chronically poor social mobility remains the key issue for our country, with youth unable to get a good job beginning, those laboring in occupations with minimal progress after the housing costs are covered, and individuals nationwide without any genuine belief their next generation will be able to do improve in life than they have.

Politicians can discuss fairer opportunities repeatedly. Yet where is the organization that has the complete plan on life chances? I see none. Whoever gets there first, prevails. Not just for their organization, but, significantly, for a entire nation that has never needed equality of opportunity so urgently.