A Growing ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Deprivation Are Found Side by Side in England.
Within a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents live in homes only several yards from their more affluent neighbours in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall literally divides the two communities in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off paths and streets that previously connected them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” remarked Serenity Colley, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to associate with us.”
A Stark National Picture
Data from government figures shows the extent of disparity can run, at times over little more than a few metres of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of austerity and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of councils now have a locality classified as one of the poorest in the nation.
The spread of poverty has coincided with a sharp rise in the quantity of places where disadvantaged and affluent residents find themselves living side by side. In 2019, just 65 of the poorest areas bordered one of the wealthiest. That figure rose to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Does More Than Separate Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the biggest in the UK and painfully apparent. The wall transcends being just a metaphorical division; it creates very real difficulties for daily routines.
- The school commute that should take a quarter of an hour become an sixty-minute journey.
- Access to important amenities like grocery stores, schools and care homes is made more difficult.
- The site can attract vandalism and loitering, with instances of rubbish being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“People strive to have a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, motioning at the rusted barricade.
Community Spirit Against a Backdrop of Challenges
At Centre4, workers emphasise that support transcends addresses. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your personal struggles,” explained chief executive a community leader.
Despite being placed in the most deprived 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a strong sense and sense of community among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% nationally.
A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford
This phenomenon is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope estate in Kent, a mid-century overspill estate, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by large detached homes built in the early 2000s that sit in the wealthiest tenth for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They might have bigger houses, but here there’s a stronger community,” commented Phil Hockley, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds don’t even speak to each other.”
The financial divide is clear: an typical three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the estate, while across the divide equivalent properties go for about £410,000.
Residents speak of a palpable feeling of neglect. “This part of the community is neglected,” said resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have slowly been taken away, and most of the community problems here are related to financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a picture of an increasingly segregated England, where prosperity and deprivation are frequently uncomfortably close neighbours.